Projects

The Center for Defense Management Research works with sponsors on research projects.

Sponsors

  • U.S. Office of Personnel Management

  • Undersecretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness

  • U.S. Navy Office of Budget

  • Office of the Chief of Naval Operations, N40, Sea Enterprise Program

  • Defense Supply Center, Richmond

  • Deputy Chief of Naval Operations (Material Readiness and Logistics)

  • Naval Postgraduate School Acquisition Chair

  • Naval Postgraduate School

  • Business Transformation Agency

  • Office of the Chief of Naval Operations N40, Task Force Energy

  • Defense Contract Audit Agency

Working with the sponsors, CDMR has conducted research projects in a variety of areas.

 

Research areas

  • The History of Defense Management Reform  ( 6 items )
    Defense Management Reform is persistent. Every Presidential Administration and Secretary of Defense has had some management reform agenda. This line of research explores the history, theories, themes, successes and failures of past Defense reforms. The objective is to understand the landscape of reform to benefit future reformers. CDMR has completed and is working on several projects in this area, to include cataloging the history of management reform, the origins of reform movements, and the efficacy of them.

  • Personnel Management Reform  ( 6 items )

    Defense Management Reform not only addresses questions of organizational structure and processes related to operational and administrative tasks, reform also has a human component. This line of work address the reforms aimed at the personnel policies or that have significant human resource elements and includes a look at the personnel system in the Department of Homeland Security and the notion of performance based pay within the military.

  • Financial Management Reform  ( 9 items )

    Most contemporary public sector management reform efforts are either explicitly tied to financial decisions (e.g., performance-based budgeting) or are implicitly tied through other management efforts (e.g., efficiency programs). Defense Management Reform is no different. Budgets reflect policy choices and are the singular opportunity for managers to acquire resources, therefore reliable, timely and relevant information is critical for defense managers to justify their programs and make them more efficient. Efforts to generate such information are a critical dimension of contemporary management reform. CDMR has completed and is working on several projects in this area, to include examinations of the factors affecting the auditability of defense financial information, the effects of budget levels on reform agendas, and oversight of defense financial management.

  • Communication and Organizational Change  ( 8 items )

    A major issue in Defense Management Reform is how to manage the communication and cultural issues involved in introducing and implementing organizational changes. CDMR has completed and is working on several projects in this area, to include the controversial introduction of personnel management reform in the Department of Homeland Security, the changes introduced by the National Security Personnel System, and the challenges involved in major enterprise reform efforts.

  • Performance Measurement and Benchmarking  ( 4 items )

    A hallmark of contemporary management reform is building the capability to measure the performance of public institutions. Defense Management Reform is no different. Demonstrating measurable success, building business cases, analyzing alternatives and allocating resources depend on the ability to measure performance. Benchmarking is a related process by which one may evaluate their performance relative to other organizations. Modeling and benchmarking can help defense managers understand, promote, and advance the success of their change initiatives. CDMR has undertaken a line of research that has included performance measures and goals for logistics processes, personnel, financial management, benchmarking practices, and organizational structures.

 
© 2010 Center for Defense Management Research